Graduate studies at Western
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3) (1994)
|Abstract||The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the significance of the existential notion of authenticity for medical ethics. This is done by analyzing authenticity and examining its implications for the patient-professional relationship and for ethical decision-making in medical situations. It is argued that while authenticity implies important demand for individual responsibility, which has therapeutic significance, it perpetuates ideas which are antithetical both to authentic interaction between patients and professionals and to fruitful deliberation of moral dilemmas. In order to counteract these consequences, an alternative idea of authenticity is introduced. According to this idea, authenticity is not regarded primarily as individual sovereignty, but as an ability to participate in a dialogue in which the subjectivity of both partners is respected. Such practice, based on mutual trust and responsibility, would enhance common decision-making and overcome the alienation between patients and professionals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeanne Liedtka (2008). Strategy Making and the Search for Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):237 - 248.
Neil Levy (2011). Enhancing Authenticity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):308-318.
M. A. B. Degenhardt (2009). Richard Peters and Valuing Authenticity. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):209-222.
Jos V. M. Welie (1994). Authenticity as a Foundational Principle of Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel (2009). Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits. Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 738,363 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,363 )
How can I increase my downloads?