David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
World Futures 64 (5 - 7):468 – 479 (2008)
Empirical evidence has demonstrated the validity and reliability of moral development instruments such as the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and Moral Judgment Test (MJT). Rasch item reliability for each was .95. A newer instrument generated using the Model of Hierarchical Complexity had item reliability of .97. Rasch scores of responses to each instruments' items correlated well with the items' measure of hierarchical complexity, r = .286, .372, .557, .767. Test items used to measure moral reasoning were significantly correlated. In general, stage of moral development did not predict political affiliation or voting, supporting Kohlberg's claim that structure, not content, underlies stage.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alan L. Lockwood (1975). Stage of Moral Development and Students' Reasoning on Public Policy Issues. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):51-61.
Chiharu Ishida (2006). How Do Scores of DIT and MJT Differ? A Critical Assessment of the Use of Alternative Moral Development Scales in Studies of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):63 - 74.
Marion E. Smith (1978). Moral Reasoning: Its Relation to Logical Thinking and Role‐Taking. Journal of Moral Education 8 (1):41-49.
Langha de Mey & Hans‐J. Schulze (1996). Indoctrination and Moral Reasoning: A Comparison Between Dutch and East German Students. Journal of Moral Education 25 (3):309-323.
Michael Lamport Commons & Sara Nora Ross (2008). The Hierarchical Complexity View of Evolution and History. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):399 – 405.
Michael Lamport Commons & Sara Nora Ross (2008). What Postformal Thought is, and Why It Matters. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):321 – 329.
James Meredith Day (2008). Human Development and the Model of Hierarchical Complexity: Learning From Research in the Psychology of Moral and Religious Development. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):452 – 467.
Sara Nora Ross & Michael Lamport Commons (2008). Applying Hierarchical Complexity to Political Development. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):480 – 497.
Michael Lamport Commons & Alexander Pekker (2008). Presenting the Formal Theory of Hierarchical Complexity. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):375 – 382.
Michael Lamport Commons (2008). Introduction to the Model of Hierarchical Complexity and its Relationship to Postformal Action. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):305 – 320.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #122,875 of 1,102,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,820 of 1,102,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?