A General Characterization of the Variable-Sharing Property by Means of Logical Matrices

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):223-244 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As is well known, the variable-sharing property (vsp) is, according to Anderson and Belnap, a necessary property of any relevant logic. In this paper, we shall consider two versions of the vsp, what we label the "weak vsp" (wvsp) and the "strong vsp" (svsp). In addition, the "no loose pieces property," a property related to the wvsp and the svsp, will be defined. Each one of these properties shall generally be characterized by means of a class of logical matrices. In this way, any logic verified by an actual matrix in one of these classes has the property the class generally represents. Particular matrices (and so, logics) in each class are provided

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On reduced matrices.Wolfgang Rautenberg - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (1):63 - 72.
Reduced products of logical matrices.Janusz Czelakowski - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):19 - 43.
The k-variable property is stronger than h-dimension K.Ian Hodkinson & András Simon - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):81-101.
Metacompleteness of Substructural Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1175-1199.
Russell's paradox.Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-10

Downloads
50 (#311,236)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gemma Robles
Universidad de León
José M. Méndez
Universidad de Salamanca

Citations of this work

Variable-Sharing as Relevance.Shawn Standefer - forthcoming - In Igor Sedlár, Shawn Standefer & Andrew Tedder (eds.), New Directions in Relevant Logic.
Strong Depth Relevance.Shay Allen Logan - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (6):645-656.
Varieties of Relevant S5.Shawn Standefer - 2023 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 32 (1):53–80.
What is a Relevant Connective?Shawn Standefer - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):919-950.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Depth relevance of some paraconsistent logics.Ross T. Brady - 1984 - Studia Logica 43 (1-2):63 - 73.
Relevant entailment--semantics and formal systems.Arnon Avron - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):334-342.
The compatibility of relevance and Mingle.José M. Méndez - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):279 - 297.
The Relevant Equivalence Property.Lloyd Humberstone & Robert Meyer - 2007 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 15 (2):165-181.
Erratum to: The compatibility of relevance and Mingle. [REVIEW]José M. Méndez - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3):339-339.

Add more references