Are transcendental theories of justice redundant?

Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):159 - 163 (2012)
Abstract
Journal of Economic Methodology, Volume 19, Issue 2, Page 159-163, June 2012
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,095
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Amartya Sen (2009). The Idea of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
John B. Davis (2012). Introduction: Values and Justice. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):99 - 99.
Amartya Sen (2012). Values and Justice. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):101 - 108.
Robert Stern (2007). Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
Amartya Sen (2012). A Reply to Robeyns, Peter and Davis. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):173 - 176.
John B. Davis (2012). The Idea of Public Reasoning. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):169 - 172.
Michael McDermott (1995). Redundant Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):523-544.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-06-24

Total downloads

20 ( #90,207 of 1,102,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.