Discussion of the conceptual basis of biosemiotics
Zygon 45 (2):409-418 (2010)
| Abstract | Kalevi Kull and colleagues recently proposed eight theses as a conceptual basis for the field of biosemiotics. We use these theses as a framework for discussing important current areas of debate in biosemiotics with particular reference to the articles collected in this issue of Zygon. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGünther Witzany (2006). Serial Endosymbiotic Theory (Set): The Biosemiotic Update. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (2).
S. ren Brier (2003). Cybersemiotics and the Question of Semiotic and Informational Thresholds. World Futures 59 (5):361 – 380.
Mikkel Gerken (2009). Conceptual Equivocation and Epistemic Relevance. Dialectica 63 (2):117-132.
Christopher Southgate & Andrew Robinson (2010). Interpretation and the Origin of Life. Zygon 45 (2):345-360.
Kalevi Kull, Terrence Deacon, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Frederik Stjernfelt (2009). Theses on Biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a Theoretical Biology. Biological Theory 4 (2):167-173.
Kalevi Kull (2009). Biosemiotics: To Know, What Life Knows. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 16 (3/4):81-88.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-05-27Total downloads23 ( #53,955 of 551,105 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,105 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
