From the History of Science to the Science of History: Scientists and Historians in the Shaping of British Marxist Theory
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 69 (4):529 - 558 (2005)
Although British Marxists in the 20th century were never a significant electoral force, Marxist intellectuals achieved prominence in a number of fields, with considerable impact on cultural and political life. Their greatest advances were in history and the natural sciences. The Red Science movement of the 1930s was spurred by the twin crises of the depression and the rise of fascism. Its influence grew until it was derailed by the Soviet genetics controversy of the late 1940s. The now-legendary school of the British Marxist Historians first emerged in the mid-1940s, but became dominant following the events of 1956. The varied origins and impacts of the Scientists and the Historians reveal the rich but generally overlooked heritage of British Marxism in the mid-20th century. They also highlight the difficulties faced by Marxist intellectuals in unifying theory with an effective political practice.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Renton (2005). Studying Their Own Nation Without Insularity? The British Marxist Historians Reconsidered. Science and Society 69 (4):559 - 579.
Russell Olwell (1996). "Condemned to Footnotes": Marxist Scholarship in the History of Science. Science and Society 60 (1):7 - 26.
Laird Addis (1966). Freedom and the Marxist Philosophy of History. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):101-.
Matt Perry (2002). Marxism and History. Palgrave.
Harold Dorn (2000). Science, Marx, and History: Are There Still Research Frontiers? Perspectives on Science 8 (3):223-254.
Ronald Edmund Doel & Thomas Söderqvist (eds.) (2006). The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology, and Medicine: Writing Recent Science. Routledge.
Sean Sayers (2008). Marxist Philosophy in Britain: An Overview. Modern Philosophy 2008 (2):52-57.
Roger S. Gottlieb (1987). History and Subjectivity: The Transformation of Marxist Theory. Humanities Press.
Peter Burke (ed.) (2002). History and Historians in the Twentieth Century. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Mayer A.-K. (2000). Setting Up a Discipline: Conflicting Agendas of the Cambridge History of Science Committee, 1936-1950. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):665-689.
Nick Knight (1996). Li Da and Marxist Philosophy in China. Westview Press.
John Blackmore (1979). On the Inverted Use of the Terms 'Realism' and 'Idealism' Among Scientists and Historians of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):125-134.
Kevin M. Doak (1998). Under the Banner of the New Science: History, Science, and the Problem of Particularity in Early Twentieth-Century Japan. Philosophy East and West 48 (2):232-256.
Marcel Van Der Linden (1997). Marx and Engels, Dutch Marxism and the "Model Capitalist Nation of the Seventeenth Century". Science and Society 61 (2):161 - 193.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads12 ( #291,215 of 1,907,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,362 of 1,907,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?