How Galileo dropped the ball and fermat picked it up
Synthese 180 (3):337-356 (2011)
| Abstract | This paper introduces a little-known episode in the history of physics, in which a mathematical proof by Pierre Fermat vindicated Galileo’s characterization of freefall. The first part of the paper reviews the historical context leading up to Fermat’s proof. The second part illustrates how a physical and a mathematical insight enabled Fermat’s result, and that a simple modification would satisfy any of Fermat’s critics. The result is an illustration of how a purely theoretical argument can settle an apparently empirical debate. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesYvon Gauthier (2008). From Fermat to Gauss. Dialogue 47 (2):411-414.
Hans-Martin Gaertner (2003). Huygens' Principle: A Case Against Optimality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):779-781.
Paul J. H. Schoemaker (2003). Huygens Versus Fermat: No Clear Winner. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):781-782.
Colin Mclarty (2010). What Does It Take to Prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the Logic of Number Theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):359-377.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-09-28Total downloads8 ( #122,951 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,983 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
