David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 47 (3):285-309 (1998)
Gilbert Harman (1990) seeks to defend psychophysical functionalism by articulating a representationalist view of the qualities of experience. The negative side of the present paper argues that the resources of this representationalist view are insufficient to ground the evident distinction between perception and (mere) thought. This failure makes the view unable to support the uses to which Harman wishes to put it. Several rescuing moves by other representationalists are considered, but none is found successful. Part of the difficulty in Harman's (...) work is that he does not adequately specify the view he rejects. The positive aim of the present paper is to provide a robust intrinsic quality account of experience that offers advantages in comparison with Harman's view, and that plainly does not fall to any of the arguments he advances
|Keywords||Experience Functionalism Intrinsic Metaphysics Perception Quality Representationalism Thought Harman, G|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Amy Kind (2010). Transparency and Representationalist Theories of Consciousness. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):902-913.
Robert Schroer (2012). Representationalism and the Scene-Immediacy of Visual Experience: A Journey to the Fringe and Back. Philosophical Psychology 25 (4):595 - 615.
Robert Schroer (2004). Environmental Representationalists on Afterimages and Phosphenes: Putting Our Best Foot Forward. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):531-546.
Robert Schroer (2007). Reticence of Visual Phenomenal Character: A Spatial Interpretation of Transparency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):393-414.
Max Deutsch (2005). Intentionalism and Intransitivity. Synthese 144 (1):1-22.
Similar books and articles
Rob Lovering (2011). The Ever Conscious View: A Critique. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):90-101.
Byron L. Haines (1993). A Critique of Harman's Empiric Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Nora Stigol (2001). Representacionalismo y qualia. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):31-38.
Sydney Shoemaker (1996). Color, Subjective Reactions, and Qualia. In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview 55-66.
Charles S. Travis (2004). The Silence of the Senses. Mind 113 (449):57-94.
Christopher S. Hill (2006). Harman on Self Referential Thoughts. Philosophical Issues 16 (1):346-357.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Who Needs the ’Actual Future Principle’?: Harman on Abortion. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):55-63.
Graham Harman (2011). The Quadruple Object. Zero Books.
Gilbert Harman (1990). The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives 4:31-52.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads79 ( #56,704 of 1,934,445 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,381 of 1,934,445 )
How can I increase my downloads?