David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 4 (2):247 (1992)
A significant feature of John Stuart Mill's moral theory is the introduction of qualitative differences as relevant to the comparative value of pleasures. Despite its significance, Mill presents his doctrine of qualities of pleasures in only a few paragraphs in the second chapter of Utilitarianism, where he begins the brief discussion by saying: utilitarian writers in general have placed the superiority of mental over bodily pleasures chiefly … in their circumstantial advantages rather than in their intrinsic nature.… [B]ut they might have taken the … higher ground with entire consistency. It is quite compatible with the principle of utility to recognize the fact, that some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others. It would be absurd that while, in estimating all other things, quality is considered as well as quantity, the estimation of pleasures should be supposed to depend on quantity alone
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
P. J. Kelly (1994). The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions: The J. S. Mill Bibliography. Utilitas 6 (2):345-348.
P. J. Kelly (1992). The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions. Utilitas 4 (1):196.
Antis Loizides (2014). Mill on Happiness: A Question of Method. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):302-321.
Similar books and articles
Steven D. Hales (2007). Mill V. Miller, or Higher and Lower Pleasures. In Steven Hales (ed.), Beer & Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell
Ki Su Kim (1988). Moral Rules and J. S. Mill's Educational Mandate. Journal of Moral Education 17 (2):105-113.
John Stuart Mill (2009). Utilitarianism. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
Michael Hauskeller (2011). No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures. Utilitas 23 (04):428-446.
Susan L. Feagin (1983). Mill and Edwards on the Higher Pleasures. Philosophy 58 (224):244 - 252.
Roderick T. Long (1992). Mill's Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character. Utilitas 4 (2):279.
Mark Strasser (1985). Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures Reexamined. International Studies in Philosophy 17 (3):51-72.
Elijah Millgram (2009). Liberty, the Higher Pleasures, and Mill's Missing Science of Ethnic Jokes. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):326-353.
Maria Ossowska (1961). Remarks on the Ancient Distinction Between Bodily and Mental Pleasures. Inquiry 4 (1-4):123-127.
Jonathan Riley (2003). Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):410–418.
Olivier Massin (2011). On Pleasures. Dissertation, Geneva
R. Edwards (1975). Do Pleasures and Pains Differ Qualitatively? Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (4):270-81.
Olivier Massin (2013). The Intentionality of Pleasures. In Denis Fisette & Guillaume Fréchette (eds.), Themes from Brentano. Rodopi 307-337.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Six Theses About Pleasure. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):247-267.
Dorothea Frede (1985). "Rumpelstiltskin's Pleasures: True and False Pleasures in Plato's" Philebus". Phronesis 30 (2):151 - 180.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads32 ( #123,667 of 1,796,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #55,101 of 1,796,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?