Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573 (2003)
|Abstract||I elaborate and defend an interpretation of Leibniz on which he is committed to a stronger space-time structure than so-called Leibnizian space-time, with absolute speeds grounded in his concept of force rather than in substantival space and time. I argue that this interpretation is well-motivated by Leibniz's mature writings, that it renders his views on space, time, motion, and force consistent with his metaphysics, and that it makes better sense of his replies to Clarke than does the standard interpretation. Further, it illuminates the way in which Leibniz took his physics to be grounded in his metaphysics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brent Mundy (1992). Space-Time and Isomorphism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:515 - 527.
Ori Belkind (2007). Newton's Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.
Jeffrey K. McDonough, Leibniz's Philosophy of Physics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Arthur (1994). Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Stephen Puryear (2012). Motion in Leibniz's Middle Years: A Compatibilist Approach. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:135-170.
Geoffrey Gorham (2011). Newton on God's Relation to Space and Time: The Cartesian Framework. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):281-320.
Nick Huggett, Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,402 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #9,674 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?