David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):227 – 240 (1992)
Abstract Richard Healey has recently defended an interactive and holistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. The present work focuses on the holistic aspects of this interpretation. Healey claims that symmetric causes are responsible for the experimental violations of the Bell inequalities and that relational holism is a metaphysical implication of these violations. Presented in this way, the holistic features of Healey's interpretation appear to provide metaphysical backing to the physical mechanism of symmetric causes. It is argued that relational holism is not a metaphysical implication at all but is actually a physical component of Healey's interpretation. Seen in this light, Healey's interpretation no longer appears to provide further insight into the violations of the Bell inequalities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James Robert Brown (1991). The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. Routledge.
Nancy Cartwright (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
Bas C. Fraassen (1982). The Charybdis of Realism: Epistemological Implications of Bell's Inequality. Synthese 52 (1):25 - 38.
Don Howard (1989). Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments. In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. 224--253.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Manfred Stöckler (1986). Philosophen in der Mikrowelt — Ratlos? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 17 (1):68-95.
Richard Healey (1999). Quantum Analogies: A Reply to Maudlin. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):440-447.
John G. Cramer (1986). The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Stephen Leeds & Richard Healey (1996). A Note on Van Fraassen's Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 63 (1):91-104.
Richard Healey (1984). On Explaining Experiences of a Quantum World. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:56 - 69.
Michael Patrick Seevinck (2004). Holism, Physical Theories and Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):693-712.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1997). Modal Interpretation of Repeated Measurement: A Rejoinder to Leeds and Healey. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):669 - 676.
Richard Healey (1989). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Healey (1995). Dissipating the Quantum Measurement Problem. Topoi 14 (1):55-65.
Tim Maudlin (1998). Healey on the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):361-368.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads44 ( #36,393 of 1,096,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?