David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 13 (4):762-788 (2004)
A common approach to explaining the perception of form is through the use of static features. The weakness of this approach points naturally to dynamic definitions of form. Considering dynamical form, however, leads inevitably to the need to explain how events are perceived as time-extended—a problem with primacy over that even of qualia. Optic flow models, energy models, models reliant on a rigidity constraint are examined. The reliance of these models on the instantaneous specification of form at an instant, t, or across a series of such instants forces the consideration of the primary memory supporting both the perception of time-extended events and the time-extension of consciousness. This cannot be reduced to an integration over space and time. The difficulty of defining the basis for this memory is highlighted in considerations of dynamic form in relation to scales of time. Ultimately, the possibility is raised that psychology must follow physics in a more profound approach to time and motion
|Keywords||*Form and Shape Perception *Memory *Time Models Motion Perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hans Wallach & D. N. O'Connell (1953). The Kinetic Depth Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (4):205.
John G. Taylor (2002). From Matter to Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (4):3-22.
Fulvio Domini & Corrado Caudek (2003). 3-D Structure Perceived From Dynamic Information: A New Theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10):444-449.
Jesse J. Prinz & Lawrence W. Barsalou (2000). Steering a Course for Embodied Representation. In Eric Dietrich Art Markman (ed.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual Change in Humans and Machines. Lawrence Erlbaum 51--77.
Citations of this work BETA
Stephen E. Robbins (2006). Bergson and the Holographic Theory of Mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):365-394.
Stephen E. Robbins (2008). Semantic Redintegration: Ecological Invariance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):726-727.
Stephen E. Robbins (2009). The Cost of Explicit Memory. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):33-66.
Similar books and articles
Joaquín M. Fuster (2003). More Than Working Memory Rides on Long-Term Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):737-737.
Jordi Fernandez (2006). Memory and Perception: Remembering Snowflake. Theoria 21 (56):147-164.
Russell J. A. Kilbourn (2010). Cinema, Memory, Modernity: The Representation of Memory From the Art Film to Transnational Cinema. Routledge.
J. T. Fraser (1987). Time, the Familiar Stranger. University of Massachusetts Press.
Naoyuki Osaka (2002). Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory for Motion. In Kunio Yasue, Marj Jibu & Tarcisio Della Senta (eds.), No Matter, Never Mind: Proceedings of Toward a Science of Consciousness: Fundamental Approaches (Tokyo '99). John Benjamins 127-136.
Alia Al-Saji (2004). The Memory of Another Past: Bergson, Deleuze and a New Theory of Time. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):203-239.
Tony Roark (2011). Aristotle on Time: A Study of the Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack (eds.) (2001). Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Re-Membering. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Susanne Ferber & Stephen M. Emrich (2007). Maintaining the Ties That Bind: The Role of an Intermediate Visual Memory Store in the Persistence of Awareness. Cognitive Neuropsychology 24 (2):187-210.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #175,574 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?