Penrose and mathematical ability
Analysis 52 (2):80-88 (1992)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Algorithm Logic Mathematics Mechanism Goedel Penrose, R | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPer Lindstrom (2006). Remarks on Penrose's New Argument. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
David J. Chalmers (1996). Minds, Machines, and Mathematics. Psyche 2:11-20.
William Seager (2003). Yesterday's Algorithm. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):265-273.
Stewart Shapiro (2003). Mechanism, Truth, and Penrose's New Argument. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Hans Moravec (1995). Roger Penrose's Gravitonic Brains: A Review of Shadows of the Mind by Roger Penrose. [REVIEW] Psyche 2 (1).
Per Lindström (2001). Penrose's New Argument. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.
Roger Penrose (1992). Comments on 'Penrose and Mathematical Ability'. Analysis 52 (2):87 - 88.
William E. Seager (2003). Yesterday's Algorithm: Penrose and the Godel Argument. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.
Roger Penrose (1989). The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #79,731 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
