Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):104-107 (1993)
|Abstract||In the context of 'Do-not-resuscitate' (DNR) decisions, there is a lack of information in the UK on the opinions of patients and prospective patients. Written anonymous responses to questionnaires issued to 322 out-patient subjects showed that 97 per cent would opt for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in their current state of health. In the hypothetical circumstance of having advanced senile dementia only 10 per cent would definitely want CPR, with 75 per cent preferring not to have CPR. There were no significant correlations between the responses and sex or age. Of 270 patients asked verbally if they found the questions disturbing, none said they did. These findings show that the great majority of patients would not wish CPR if severely senile, and that patients are not disturbed by questions relating to their choice for or against CPR. This should encourage further investigations of patients' opinions on CPR in a broader range of conditions, and greater use of DNR orders|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles Weijer, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State: Futile or Acceptable?
R. Sivakumar (2004). Communicating Information on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to Hospitalised Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):311-312.
J. Wilson (2008). To What Extent Should Older Patients Be Included in Decisions Regarding Their Resuscitation Status? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):353-356.
G. E. Mead & C. J. Turnbull (1995). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Elderly: Patients' and Relatives' Views. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):39-44.
A. J. Gorton, N. V. G. Jayanthi, P. Lepping & M. W. Scriven (2008). Patients' Attitudes Towards "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" Status. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):624-626.
P.-A. Abboud (2006). What Determines Whether Patients Are Willing to Participate in Resuscitation Studies Requiring Exception From Informed Consent? Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):468-472.
S. A. Hurst, M. Becerra, A. Perrier, N. J. Perron, S. Cochet & B. Elger (2013). Including Patients in Resuscitation Decisions in Switzerland: From Doing More to Doing Better. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (3):158-165.
A. J. Rosin & M. Sonnenblick (1998). Autonomy and Paternalism in Geriatric Medicine. The Jewish Ethical Approach to Issues of Feeding Terminally Ill Patients, and to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):44-48.
A. Culbert (2005). Parental Preferences for Neonatal Resuscitation Research Consent: A Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (12):721-726.
Dominic Wilkinson (2009). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Intensive Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (6):401-410.
E. Akyuz & F. Erdemir (forthcoming). Surgical Patients and Nurses' Opinions and Expectations About Privacy in Care. Nursing Ethics 20 (6):660-671.
Kirsti Torjuul, Ann Nordam & Venke Sørlie (2005). Action Ethical Dilemmas in Surgery: An Interview Study of Practicing Surgeons. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-9.
Roslyn Weiss (2007). Natural Order or Divine Will: Maimonides on Cosmogony and Prophecy. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (1):1-26.
S. Honeybul, K. M. Ho & G. R. Gillett (forthcoming). Traumatic Brain Injury: An Objective Model of Consent. [REVIEW] Neuroethics:1-8.
Laura Sheard, Hayley Prout, Dawn Dowding, Simon Noble, Ian Watt, Anthony Maraveyas & Miriam Johnson (2012). The Ethical Decisions UK Doctors Make Regarding Advanced Cancer Patients at the End of Life - the Perceived (in) Appropriateness of Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):22-.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?