David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):5-12 (2000)
Emmanuel Levinas argues that justice is meaningful only to the extent that other persons are encountered in their individuality, as my neighbors, and not merely abstract citizens of a political community. That is, the political demand for justice arises from my ethical relationship with the other whose face I cannot look past. But despite his revolutionary ideas about the origins of justice, Levinas ultimately appeals to a very traditional view of justice in which persons are considered equal and comparable. and responsibilities and rights are distributed evenly among them. In response to Levinas, I argue that insofar as justice is constructed by and for the ethicalrelationship, it must also be deconstructed by that relationship. If one takes seriously Levinas’s claim that asymmetrical ethical responsibility is the origin of justice, then one must also reject Levinas’s suggestion that justice involves viewing persons and responsibilities as comparable and symmetrical
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
V. Tahmasebi (2010). Does Levinas Justify or Transcend Liberalism? Levinas on Human Liberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):523-544.
William Simmons (1999). The Third: Levinas' Theoretical Move From an-Archical Ethics to the Realm of Justice and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (6):83-104.
Elisabeth Louise Thomas (2004). Emmanuel Levinas: Ethics, Justice, and the Human Beyond Being. Routledge.
P. Nortvedt (2003). Levinas, Justice and Health Care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):25-34.
Sarah Roberts-Cady (2009). Rethinking Justice with Levinas. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lucas D. Introna (2007). Singular Justice and Software Piracy. Business Ethics 16 (3):264–277.
Elizabeth Wijaya (2012). To Learn to Live with Spectral Justice: Derrida–Levinas. Derrida Today 5 (2):232-247.
Alphonso Lingis (1999). Objectivity and of Justice: A Critique of Emmanuel Levinas' Explanations. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):395-407.
Thornton C. Lockwood (2006). Ethical Justice and Political Justice. Phronesis 51 (1):29 - 48.
Blain Neufeld & Chad Schoelandt (2014). Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality. Law and Philosophy 33 (1):75-104.
Jacob Meskin (2007). The Role of Lurianic Kabbalah in the Early Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Levinas Studies 2:49-77.
Xianzhong Huang (2007). Justice as a Virtue: An Analysis of Aristotle's Virtue of Justice. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):265-279.
Chelsea Luthringer (2000). So What is Justice Anyway? Rosen Pub. Group.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads3 ( #224,108 of 1,089,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?