Graduate studies at Western
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):255-263 (1999)
|Abstract||Health technology assessment (HTA) is often biased in the sense that it neglects relevant perspectives on the technology in question. To incorporate different perspectives in HTA, we should pursue agreement about what are relevant, plausible, and feasible research questions; interactive technology assessment (iTA) might be suitable for this goal. In this way a kind of procedural ethics is established. Currently, ethics too often is focussed on the application of general principles, which leaves a lot of confusion as to what really is the matter in specific cases; in an iTA clashes of values should not be approached by use of such ethics. Instead, casuistry, as a tool used within the framework of iTA, should help to articulate and clarify what is the matter, as to make room for explication and consensus building|
|Keywords||casuistry cochlear implants health technology assessment interactive evaluation normative bias|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. P. B. Reuzel, G. J. van der Wilt, H. A. M. J. ten Have & P. F. Vries Robdeb (2001). Interactive Technology Assessment and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245 – 261.
Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta (2000). The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.
Rob Reuzel (2004). Interactive Technology Assessment of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
Bjørn Hofmann (2005). On Value-Judgements and Ethics in Health Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):277-295.
Gert J. Van Der Wilt (1995). Empirical and Normative Aspects of Medical Technology Assessment. The Case of Reduced-Size Liver Transplantations with Living Donors. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (3).
Rob Reuzel, Gert Jan van Der Wilt, Pieter Vries Robbdeé & Henk ten Have (2001). A View From the Netherlands: Ethics as Interactive Evaluation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):110-114.
G. J. van Der Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 2 (2-3):195-206.
Pedro Gallo (2004). Integrating Ethical Enquiry and Health Technology Assessment: Limits and Opportunities for Efficiency and Equity. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):103-117.
John Grin (2004). Health Technology Assessment Between Our Health Care System and Our Health: Exploring the Potential of Reflexive HTA. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):157-174.
G. Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):195-206.
Marianne Boenink (2012). Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons From the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (1):84-102.
Armin Grunwald (2004). The Normative Basis of (Health) Technology Assessment and the Role of Ethical Expertise. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):175-193.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Anne Chapman (2004). Technology as World Building. Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):59 – 72.
Lantz Miller (2012). The Moral Philosophy of Automobiles. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):637-655.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads4 ( #190,122 of 754,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 754,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?