Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization–society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research
Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming)
| Abstract | In this study we analyze the overlapping perspectives of legitimacy theory, institutional theory, resource dependence theory, and stakeholder theory. Our purpose is to explore how these theories can inform and be built upon by one another. Through our analysis we provide a broader theoretical understanding of these theories that may support and promote social and environmental accounting research. This article starts with a detailed analysis of legitimacy theory by bringing some recent critical discussions on legitimacy and corporations in the management literature into accounting research. The notion forwarded by legitimacy theory then serves as an overarching concept to examine the relationship between and among theories. We conclude that two theoretical considerations are important for future social and environmental accounting research. First, it must be acknowledged that some business entities initiate social activities based on direct interactions with stakeholders, whereas others may also undertake similar activities to manage their societal level of legitimacy. Second, from analyzing the perspectives of legitimacy theory, institutional theory, resource dependence theory, and stakeholder theory, it is possible to reach compatible interpretations of business social phenomena, and the selection and application of these theories should depend upon the focus of study | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCarmelo Reverte (2009). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):351 - 366.
Anne van Aaken (2002). Deliberative Institutional Economics, or Does Homo Oeconomicus Argue?: A Proposal for Combining New Institutional Economics with Discourse Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (4):361-394.
Barbara Beliveau, Melville Cottrill & Hugh M. O'Neill (1994). Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Model Drawn From Three Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):731 - 738.
Martin Mueller, Virginia Gomes dos Santos & Stefan Seuring (2009). The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):509 - 523.
Gerwin Van Der Laan, Hans Van Ees & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn (2008). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):299 - 310.
Maria J. Masanet-Llodra (2006). Environmental Management Accounting: A Case Study Research on Innovative Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):393 - 408.
James A. Schweikart (1992). Cognitive-Contingency Theory and the Study of Ethics in Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):471 - 478.
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Robert Phillips (2003). Stakeholder Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):25-41.
Robin W. Roberts & Lois Mahoney (2004). Stakeholder Conceptions of the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):399-431.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-06-30Total downloads13 ( #88,007 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
