David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):315-329 (1986)
I have argued elsewhere that there are facts, and possibilities, that are not purely qualitative. In a second paper, however, I have argued that all possibilities are purely qualitative except insofar as they involve individuals that actually exist. In particular, I have argued that there are no thisnesses of nonactual individuals (where the thisness of x is the property of being x, or of being identical with x), and that there are no singular propositions about nonactual individuals (where a singular proposition about an individual x is a proposition that involves or refers to x directly, perhaps by having x or the thisness of x as a constituent, and not merely by way of x's qualitative properties or relations to other individuals). I am also inclined to believe that there are not yet any thisnesses of individuals that will exist but do not yet, nor any singular propositions about future individuals--and, hence, that all possibilities are purely qualitative except insofar as they involve individuals that already do exist or have existed (counting timeless individuals, if any, as already existing). This thesis about the relation of time to thisness is the subject of the present paper, in which the conclusions of my previous papers will be presupposed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Caplan & David Sanson (2011). Presentism and Truthmaking. Philosophy Compass 6 (3):196-208.
Theodore Sider (1996). All the World's a Stage. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):433 – 453.
David Ingram (forthcoming). The Virtues of Thisness Presentism. Philosophical Studies:1-22.
Joseph Diekemper (2005). Presentism and Ontological Symmetry. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):223 – 240.
Rafael De Clercq (2006). Presentism and the Problem of Cross-Time Relations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):386-402.
Similar books and articles
John O'Leary-Hawthorne & J. A. Cover (1997). Framing the Thisness Issue. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1):102 – 108.
Graeme Forbes (1983). Thisness and Vagueness. Synthese 54 (2):235-259.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1989). Adams on Actualism and Presentism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (2):289-298.
Robert Merrihew Adams (1979). Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity. Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):5-26.
Joseph Diekemper (2009). Thisness and Events. Journal of Philosophy 106 (5):255-276.
Robert Merrihew Adams (1981). Actualism and Thisness. Synthese 49 (1):3-41.
Richard Swinburne (1995). Thisness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):389 – 400.
Robert Merrihew Adams (1997). Thisness and Time Travel. Philosophia 25 (1-4):407-415.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads191 ( #14,397 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #68,756 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?