David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In January, 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt submitted an ambitious plan for administrative reform of the national government to Congress. The Brownlow recommendations produced intense debate in Congress. However, some of the most important skirmishes in this battle were not fought in public, and even after half a century remain largely obscured from public view. One such skirmish was the contest within the academic community about the recommendations on administrative reform that were to be put before Congress. This paper considers why all three parties to this fight -- the Brownlow Committee, the Brookings Institution, and the Rockefeller Foundation -- went to such lengths to avoid public disagreement about the Brownlow recommendations. A public disagreement threatened to undermine the academic community's demonstration of neutrality, and thus to undermine the stability of the Public Administration community itself.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kayhan P. Parsi & Karen E. Geraghty (2004). The Bioethicist as Public Intellectual. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):17 – 23.
Gwendolyn Roberts Majette (2011). PPACA and Public Health: Creating a Framework to Focus on Prevention and Wellness and Improve the Public's Health. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):366-379.
Alison M. Jaggar (2007). Teaching in Colorado: Not a Rocky Mountain High; Academic Freedom in a Climate of Repression. Teaching Philosophy 30 (2):149-172.
T. M. Wilkinson (2010). Community, Public Health and Resource Allocation. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):267-271.
D. S. Henderson (1980). Academic Excellence, Community Colleges and Administrative Efficiency. Philosophical Papers 9 (sup001):173-189.
Jon Nixon (2001). 'Not Without Dust and Heat': The Moral Bases of the 'New' Academic Professionalism. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (2):173 - 186.
Carmen Juravle & Alan Lewis (2008). Identifying Impediments to Sri in Europe: A Review of the Practitioner and Academic Literature. [REVIEW] Business Ethics 17 (3):285–310.
Chance W. Lewis & BethRené Roepnack (2007). Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure: Can They Survive in the Market Place of Ideas? [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):221-232.
Colleen Reid & Elana Brief (2009). Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):75-85.
Emanuel Donchin (2006). The Constraints of Academic Politics Are Not Violations of Academic Freedom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):572-573.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,426 )
How can I increase my downloads?