David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):127-136 (2002)
Bioethic reflects â like many other disciplines â the cultural fragmentation and the complexity of what has come to be known as the postmodern condition. The case of bioethics is particularly acute because of its epistemological indeterminacy and the moral pluralism characterizing post liberal societies. A provisional solution to this situation is the retrieval of a neo-Kantian version of ethical formalism in which concern for a consensus on rules replaces universal dialogue on moral content. The article analyzes the possible consequences of this solution with reference to theological ethics. In particular, the reduction of ethical rationality to a function of political regulation on the one hand, and the implicit legitimization of ethical relativism on the other, push any theological contribution to bioethics to the margins. The central methodological issue for the articulation of theological discourse in bioethics is how to avoid the pitfall of privatism while creating the conditions for ethical dialogue across different traditions
|Keywords||bioethics postmodernism theological methodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dennis Hollinger (1989). Can Bioethics Be Evangelical? Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):161-179.
Pam McGrath (1998). Autonomy, Discourse, and Power: A Postmodern Reflection on Principlism and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):516 – 532.
Graham Ward (ed.) (1997). The Postmodern God: A Theological Reader. Blackwell Publishers.
John P. Crossley Jr (1978). Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy. Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121 - 134.
Saral Jhingran (2001). Ethical Relativism and Universalism. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Martin E. Marty (1992). Religion, Theology, Church, and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):273-289.
Rosemarie Tong (2002). Teaching Bioethics in the New Millennium: Holding Theories Accountable to Actual Practices and Real People. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):417 – 432.
Jack Bonsor (1995). Truth and History. Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):49-56.
Nathan Emmerich (2011). Literature, History and the Humanization of Bioethics. Bioethics 25 (2):112-118.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín (2010). An Undignified Bioethics: There is No Method in This Madness. Bioethics 26 (4):224-230.
Max Charlesworth (2005). Don't Blame the 'Bio' — Blame the 'Ethics': Varieties of (Bio) Ethics and the Challenge of Pluralism. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):10-17.
Sue M. Patterson (1999). Realist Christian Theology in a Postmodern Age. Cambridge University Press.
James M. Brandt (1989). Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher's Theological Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):51 - 72.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads1 ( #445,646 of 1,102,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?