The debate between mencius and hsün-Tzu: Contemporary applications
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (1):31-49 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesY. P. Mei (1951). Hsün-Tzŭ on Terminology. Philosophy East and West 1 (2):51-66.
Whalen Lai (1993). The Public Good That Does the Public Good: A New Reading of Mohism. Asian Philosophy 3 (2):125 – 141.
Chʻu Chai (1965). The Humanist Way in Ancient China. New York, Bantam Books.
Liang Ch'I.-Hsiung (1974). A Descriptive Review of Hsün-Tzu's Thought. Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (1):4-60.
T'ang Hsiao-Wen (1976). Why is Hsün Tzu Called A Legalist? Contemporary Chinese Thought 8 (1):21-35.
David Elstein, Xunzi. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kwong-Loi Shun (1991). Mencius and the Mind-Inherence of Morality: Mencius' Rejection of Kao Tzu's Maxim in Meng Tzu 2a:2 1: I. Kao Tzu's Maxim. [REVIEW] Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (4):371-386.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Cecilia Wee (2007). Hsun Tzu on Family and Familial Relations. Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads15 ( #78,613 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
