David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (1):31-49 (1998)
This article takes one of the richest historical debates, that of Hsun-Tzu and Mencius, as the contextual starting-point for the elaboration of human goodness. In support of Mencius, this article develops additional metaphysical and bio-social-evolutionary grounds, both of which parallel each other. The metaphysical analysis suggests that, in the spirit of Spinoza, an entity’s nature must necessarily include the drive toward its preservation. Likewise, the multi-faceted bio-social-evolutionary argument locates the fundamental telos of humanity in the preservation of social ties and species preservation, leading to a life-affirming philosophy and bio-psychological deduction of human emotions based on the primary emotion of love.
|Keywords||Hsun-Tzu Xunzi Mencius Confucianism Human Nature Human Goodness Good and Evil Bio-Social-Evolutionary Theory Bio-Psychological Deduction of the Emotions Self-Preservation as Essence Primacy of Love|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
A. S. Cua (1978). The Quasi-Empirical Aspect of Hsün-Tzu's Philosophy of Human Nature. Philosophy East and West 28 (1):3-19.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Y. P. Mei (1951). Hsün-Tzŭ on Terminology. Philosophy East and West 1 (2):51-66.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Kwong-Loi Shun (1991). Mencius and the Mind-Inherence of Morality: Mencius' Rejection of Kao Tzu's Maxim in Meng Tzu 2a:2 1: I. Kao Tzu's Maxim. [REVIEW] Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (4):371-386.
David Elstein, Xunzi. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
T'ang Hsiao-Wen (1976). Why is Hsün Tzu Called A Legalist? Contemporary Chinese Thought 8 (1):21-35.
Liang Ch'I.-Hsiung (1974). A Descriptive Review of Hsün-Tzu's Thought. Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (1):4-60.
Chʻu Chai (1965). The Humanist Way in Ancient China. New York, Bantam Books.
Whalen Lai (1993). The Public Good That Does the Public Good: A New Reading of Mohism. Asian Philosophy 3 (2):125 – 141.
Cecilia Wee (2007). Hsun Tzu on Family and Familial Relations. Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads39 ( #107,732 of 1,911,052 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #42,122 of 1,911,052 )
How can I increase my downloads?