David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics Quarterly 2 (1):39-45 (1980)
The role of EEG in confirming the clinical diagnosis of isolated brain death has undergone evolutionary changes since the original recommendations concerning its use. Accumulated evidence now supports that approach that the EEG can be used not only as a confirmatory test for brain death, but one which considerably facilitates making the diagnosis. Using the EEG, brain death can often be identified with absolute certainty within just a few, rather than the previously recommended 24 or more hours after a known precipitating event. Guidelines to this effect have now been established
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald E. Cranford & Barbara K. Patrick (1981). Confirmatory Tests in the Diagnosis of Brain Death: The Role of the Radioisotope Brain Scan. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):67-72.
Ari Joffe (2010). Are Recent Defences of the Brain Death Concept Adequate? Bioethics 24 (2):47-53.
Douglas N. Walton (1981). Epistemology of Brain Death Determination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274.
Ronald E. Cranford & Barbara Killpatrick (1981). Tests in the Diagnosis of Brain Death: The Role of the Radioisotope Brain Scan. Bioethics Quarterly 3:67-72.
Masahiro Morioka (2001). Reconsidering Brain Death: A Lesson From Japan's Fifteen Years of Experience. Hastings Center Report 31 (4):41-46.
Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
V. Kolev & J. Yordanova (2000). The Position of Event-Related EEG Activity in the Local/Global Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):407-407.
Mark E. Pflieger (2000). Brain Function Theories, EEG Sources, and Dynamic States. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):411-412.
Alexander A. Fingelkurts, Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Sergio Bagnato, Cristina Boccagni & Giuseppe Galardi (2013). The Value of Spontaneous EEG Oscillations in Distinguishing Patients in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States. In Eror Basar & et all (eds.), Application of Brain Oscillations in Neuropsychiatric Diseases. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier. 81-99.
Mark E. Pflieger (2003). Inferring Contextual Field Interactions From Scalp EEG. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):99-100.
Mike Nair-Collins (2010). Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):667-683.
Paul L. Nunez (2000). Neocortical Dynamic Theory Should Be as Simple as Possible, but Not Simpler. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):415-432.
Lea-Rachel D. Kosnik (2007). Refusing to Budge: A Confirmatory Bias in Decision Making? Mind and Society 7 (2):193-214.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads5 ( #265,239 of 1,692,629 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,401 of 1,692,629 )
How can I increase my downloads?