The Effects of Contextual and Wrongdoing Attributes on Organizational Employees' Whistleblowing Intentions Following Fraud
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):213-227 (2012)
Recent financial fraud legislation such as the Dodd–Frank Act and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (U.S. House of Representatives, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, [H.R. 4173], 2010 ; U.S. House of Representatives, The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, Public Law 107-204 [H.R. 3763], 2002 ) relies heavily on whistleblowers for enforcement, and offers protection and incentives for whistleblowers. However, little is known about many aspects of the whistleblowing decision, especially the effects of contextual and wrongdoing attributes on organizational members’ willingness to report fraud. We extend the ethics literature by experimentally investigating how the nature of the wrongdoing and the awareness of those surrounding the whistleblower can influence whistleblowing. As predicted, we find that employees are less likely to report: (1) financial statement fraud than theft; (2) immaterial than material financial statement fraud; (3) when the wrongdoer is aware that the potential whistleblower has knowledge of the fraud; and (4) when others in addition to the wrongdoer are not aware of the fraud. Our findings extend whistleblowing research in several ways. For instance, prior research provides little evidence concerning the effects of fraud type, wrongdoer awareness, and others’ awareness on whistleblowing intentions. We also provide evidence that whistleblowing settings represent an exception to the well-accepted theory of diffusion of responsibility. Our participants are professionals who represent the likely pool of potential whistleblowers in organizations
|Keywords||Context Diffusion of responsibility Fraud Fraud type Whistleblowing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus & Chockalingam Viswesvaran (2005). Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):277 - 297.
Eva E. Tsahuridu & Wim Vandekerckhove (2008). Organisational Whistleblowing Policies: Making Employees Responsible or Liable? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):107 - 118.
Dilek Zamantili Nayir & Christian Herzig (2012). Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):197-213.
Heungsik Park, Michael T. Rehg & Donggi Lee (2005). The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on Whistleblowing Intentions: A Study of South Korean Public Employees. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (4):387 - 403.
Tim Barnett (1992). A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship Between Selected Organizational Characteristics and External Whistleblowing by Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):949 - 959.
David Lewis (2011). Whistleblowing in a Changing Legal Climate: Is It Time to Revisit Our Approach to Trust and Loyalty at the Workplace? Business Ethics 20 (1):71-87.
Randi L. Sims & John P. Keenan (1998). Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):411-421.
TerryMorehead Dworkin & Melissa S. Baucus (1998). Internal Vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298.
Hayden Teo & Donella Caspersz (2011). Dissenting Discourse: Exploring Alternatives to the Whistleblowing/Silence Dichotomy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):237-249.
Heungsik Park & John Blenkinsopp (2009). Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – a Survey of South Korean Police Officers. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):545 - 556.
Elletta Sangrey Callahan & John W. Collins (1992). Employee Attitudes Toward Whistleblowing: Management and Public Policy Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):939 - 948.
James A. Benson & David L. Ross (1998). Sundstrand: A Case Study in Transformation of Cultural Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1517 - 1527.
Julia Zhang, Randy Chiu & Liqun Wei (2009). Decision-Making Process of Internal Whistleblowing Behavior in China: Empirical Evidence and Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):25 - 41.
Joan E. Sieber (1998). The Psychology of Whistleblowing. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):7-23.
Amy J. Fredin (2011). The Effects of Anticipated Regret on the Whistleblowing Decision. Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):404 - 427.
Added to index2011-08-14
Total downloads11 ( #111,044 of 1,004,686 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,686 )
How can I increase my downloads?