The Role of Causation in Decision of Tort Law
Journal of Law, Development and Politics 1 (2) (2010)
| Abstract | Tort law depends on three key concepts: causation, responsibility, and fault. However, I argue that the three key concepts are neither necessary, nor sufficient, for tort. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Causation Responsibility Law | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJos Lehmann, Joost Breuker & Bob Brouwer (2004). Causation in AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):279-315.
Larry A. Alexander (1987). Causation and Corrective Justice: Does Tort Law Make Sense? Law and Philosophy 6 (1):1 - 23.
Gerald J. Postema (ed.) (2001). Philosophy and the Law of Torts. Cambridge University Press.
Avihay Dorfman (2010). Can Tort Law Be Moral? Ratio Juris 23 (2):205-228.
Jonathan Schaffer (2012). Disconnection and Responsibility. Legal Theory 18 (Special Issue 04):399-435.
David G. Owen (ed.) (1995). Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-09Total downloads56 ( #17,747 of 548,979 )Recent downloads (6 months)28 ( #1,637 of 548,979 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
