Uniqueness in definite noun phrases
Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):287-350 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnna Szabolcsi (1997). Introduction to Ways of Scope Taking. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Kluwer.
Irene Heim (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Dissertation, UMass Amherst
Greg N. Carlson (1979). Generics and Atemporalwhen. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):49 - 98.
Christa Hauenschild (1985). Definite Vs. Indefinite Interpretation of Russian Noun Phrases: A Proposal of a Format for Complex Evaluation Rules. Journal of Semantics 4 (4):371-387.
Peter Lasersohn (1989). On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1):130-134.
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Desires, Scope, and Tense. Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):141-163.
John Justice (2007). Unified Semantics of Singular Terms. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):363–373.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads27 ( #45,806 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
