Social Philosophy Today 17:253-263 (2001)
|Abstract||Axel Honneth has outlined a critical social theory in terms of recognition. He has recently argued that his theory is superior to the communications framework ofHabermas in that it better achieves the goals of providing normative criticism of society's ability to foster genuine and full sell-realization and explaining how emancipatory social movements can emerge within existing society. After exploring these arguments and their implications for critical theory, this paper concludes that Honneth's criticisms of Habermas fail and that the former's recognition theory cannot provide an adequate free-standing alternative critical framework. lnstead, it is argued that recognition theory is best seen as a complement of a critical theory for which the normative basis remains Habermasian discourse ethics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bert van den Brink & David Owen (eds.) (2007). Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Jean-Philippe Deranty (2006). Repressed Materiality: Retrieving the Materialism in Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 7 (1):113-140.
Carl-Göran Heidegren (2002). Anthropology, Social Theory, and Politics: Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Inquiry 45 (4):433 – 446.
G. Marcelo (2013). Recognition and Critical Theory Today: An Interview with Axel Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):209-221.
Somogy Varga (2010). Critical Theory and the Two-Level Account of Recognition -Towards a New Foundation? Critical Horizons 11 (1):19-33.
Radu Neculau (2012). Being Oneself in Another: Recognition and the Culturalist Deformation of Identity. Inquiry 55 (2):148-170.
Jean-Philippe Deranty (2004). Injustice, Violence and Social Struggle. The Critical Potential of Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 5 (1):297-322.
Simon Thompson (2005). Is Redistribution a Form of Recognition? Comments on the Fraser–Honneth Debate. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):85-102.
Rauno Huttunen & Mark Murphy (2012). Discourse and Recognition as Normative Grounds for Radical Pedagogy: Habermasian and Honnethian Ethics in the Context of Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (2):137-152.
Bart van Leeuwen (2007). A Formal Recognition of Social Attachments: Expanding Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Inquiry 50 (2):180 – 205.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2004). Recognitive Freedom: Hegel and the Problem of Recognition. Critical Horizons 5 (1):271-295.
Kelly Staples (2012). Statelessness and the Politics of Misrecognition. Res Publica 18 (1):93-106.
Christopher F. Zurn (2005). Recognition, Redistribution, and Democracy: Dilemmas of Honneth's Critical Social Theory. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):89–126.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads2 ( #245,513 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?