David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 43 (3):499-526 (2004)
In 1983, in an open letter to the journal Nature, Karl Popper and David Miller set forth a particularly strong critical argument which sought to demonstrate the impossibility of inductive probability. Since its publication the argument has faced many criticisms and we argue in this article that they do not reach their objectives. We will first reconstruct the demonstration made by Popper and Miller in their initial article and then try to evaluate the main arguments against it. Although it is possible to conceptualize logically the idea of induction, it is shown that it is not possible on traditional Bayesian grounds
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred Schramm (2006). Methodological Objectivism and Critical Rationalist ’Induction’. In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume II. Ashgate.
Burke Townsend (1989). Partly Deductive Support in the Popper-Miller Argument. Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.
Andrew Elby (1994). Contentious Contents: For Inductive Probability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):193-200.
Colin Howson (1989). On a Recent Objection to Popper and Miller's "Disproof" of Probabilistic Induction. Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680.
James Cussens (1996). Deduction, Induction and Probabilistic Support. Synthese 108 (1):1 - 10.
David Miller (1999). Popper and Tarski. In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
I. J. Good (1990). A Suspicious Feature of the Popper/Miller Argument. Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536.
Georg J. W. Dorn (1995). Inductive Countersupport. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):187 - 189.
Donald Gillies (1986). In Defense of the Popper-Miller Argument. Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #136,407 of 1,008,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?