David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 65 (3):405-426 (2006)
Due to the influence of Nathan Salmon’s views, endorsement of the “flexibility of origins” thesis is often thought to carry a commitment to the denial of S4. This paper rejects the existence of this commitment and examines how Peacocke’s theory of the modal may accommodate flexibility of origins without denying S4. One of the essential features of Peacocke’s account is the identification of the Principles of Possibility, which include the Modal Extension Principle (MEP), and a set of Constitutive Principles. Regarding their modal status, Peacocke argues for the necessity of MEP, but leaves open the possibility that some of the Constitutive Principles be only contingently true. Here, I show that the contingency of the Constitutive Principles is inconsistent with the recursivity of MEP, and this makes the account validate S4. It is also shown that, compatibly with the necessity of the Constitutive Principles, the account can still accommodate intuitions about flexibility of origins. However, the account we end up with once those intuitions are consistently accommodated may not be satisfactory, and this opens up the debate about whether or not artefacts allow for some variation in their origins.
|Keywords||Modality Metaphysics Modal Logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Danilo Šuster (2005). The Modality Principle and Work-Relativity of Modality. Acta Analytica 20 (4):41-52.
Sonia Roca-Royes (2010). Modal Epistemology, Modal Concepts and the Integration Challenge. Dialectica 64 (3):335-361.
Anand Jayprakash Vaidya (2010). Understanding and Essence. Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
C. Peacocke (1997). Metaphysical Necessity: Understanding, Truth and Epistemology. Mind 106 (423):521-574.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2012). Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):93–115.
PM Sullivan (1998). Discussion. The 'Modal Extension Principle': A Question About Peacocke's Approach to Modality. Mind 107 (427):653-660.
Peter M. Sullivan (1998). The "Modal Extension Principle": A Question About Peacocke's Approach to Modality. Mind 107 (427):653-660.
Christopher Peacocke (2002). The Principle-Based Account of Modality: Elucidations and Resources. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):663–679.
Sonia Roca Royes (2006). Peacocke's Principle-Based Account of Modality: “Flexibility of Origins” Plus S4. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 65 (3):405 - 426.
Added to index2010-06-24
Total downloads63 ( #19,123 of 1,005,996 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,934 of 1,005,996 )
How can I increase my downloads?