David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Diogenes 56 (2-3):84-94 (2009)
This paper concerns two themes: my personal experience of Russian philosophy and Russian philosophers on the one hand, and historicism on the other. My account of my limited experience of Russian philosophers and philosophy will be mainly autobiographical. My remarks about historicism will concern a single aspect of the philosophical consequences of the Soviet experience for Russian philosophy. When I come to Russia, I am always surprised by the degree of interest in a historical approach to knowledge, an interest that, so far as I know, is unique to Russian philosophy. This difference in perspective as concerns the historical character of cognitive claims needs to be explained. It needs to be explained why contemporary Russian philosophers and contemporary Russian philosophy are so hospitable to a historical approach to knowledge, an approach which has always been rare, even unusual, elsewhere. My hypothesis, which I examine the paper, is that there is a deep link between contemporary Russian interest in a historical approach to knowledge and Soviet philosophy. In particular, there is a link to Marx, who is a historical thinker, and to pre-Soviet Russian philosophy, as distinguished from Marxism, which is basically a-historical
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fred A. Seddon (1986). Northrop on Russian Communism. Studies in East European Thought 32 (2):133-154.
Edward M. Swiderski (1998). Culture, Contexts, and Directions in Russian Post-Soviet Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 50 (4):283-328.
Z. A. Kamenskii (2000). Was There a Break in the Development of Russian Philosophy in the Soviet Period of Its History? Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (2):86-91.
James P. Scanlan (2001). Main Currents of Post-Soviet Philosophy in Russia. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:121-129.
James M. Edie (1965). Russian Philosophy. Chicago, Quadrangle Books.
Natalia Avtonomova (2001). On the (Re)Creation of Russian Philosophical Language. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:83-94.
A. I. Volodin (2000). The Three Ps, or, On Contemporary Versions of the History of Russian Philosophy in the Soviet Period. Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (2):70-78.
E. van der Zweerde (2009). The Place of Russian Philosophy in World Philosophical History -- A Perspective. Diogenes 56 (2-3):170-186.
Evert Van Der Zweerde (2001). The Normalization of the History of Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russian Philosophical Culture. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:95-104.
John Gonzalez (2007). In Pursuit of a Historical Tradition: N. A. Rozhkov's Scientific Laws of History. Studies in East European Thought 59 (4):309 - 346.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads15 ( #241,100 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?