Mind 116 (464):851 - 874 (2007)
|Abstract||Spinoza's response to a certain radical form of scepticism has deep and surprising roots in his rationalist metaphysics. I argue that Spinoza's commitment to the Principle of Sufficient Reason leads to his naturalistic rejection of certain sharp, inexplicable bifurcations in reality such as the bifurcations that a Cartesian system posits between mind and body and between will and intellect. I show how Spinoza identifies and rejects a similar bifurcation between the representational character of ideas or mental states and the epistemic status of these ideas, a bifurcation to which Spinoza sees the radical sceptic committed. Spinoza's rejection of this bifurcation helps to explain some of his most cryptic statements concerning scepticism and also reveals a promising and highly metaphysical strategy for understanding and responding to scepticism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pierfrancesco Basile (2012). Russell on Spinoza's Substance Monism. Metaphysica 13 (1):27-41.
Hubertus Gezinus Hubbeling (1967). Spinoza's Methodology. Assen, Van Gorcum & Comp..
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.) (2010). Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Steven M. Nadler (2006). Spinoza's Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
George Louis Kline (1952/1981). Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy: A Series of Essays, Selected and Translated, and with an Introduction. Hyperion Press.
Olli Koistinen & J. I. Biro (eds.) (2002). Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford University Press.
Steven Nadler (2008). Spinoza and Consciousness. Mind 117 (467):575-601.
Michael Della Rocca (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #8,501 of 549,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?