|Abstract||_This article articulates the presuppositions that psychology inherited from logical positivism, and how_ _those presuppositions effected the interpretation of data and research procedures. Despite the efforts of_ _Wundt, his most well known disciples, Titchener and Külpe, embraced an atomistic view of experience which_ _was at_ _least partly responsible for many of their failures. When the behaviorists rejected the_ _introspectionism of Titchener and Külpe, they kept their atomism, using the reflex_|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
L. Holt (1999). Rationality is Still Hard Work: Some Further Notes on the Disruptive Effects of Deliberation. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):215-219.
Thomas Sturm & Annette Mülberger (2012). Crisis Discussions in Psychology—New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):425-433.
Alicia Juarrero Roqué (1987). Does Action Theory Rest on a Mistake? Philosophy Research Archives 13:587-612.
Thomas Mormann (1997). Topological Aspects of Combinatorial Possibility. Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:75 - 92.
Melinda Hogan (1994). What is Wrong with an Atomistic Account of Mental Representation. Synthese 100 (2):307-27.
Eric Margolis (1998). How to Acquire a Concept. Mind and Language 13 (3):347-369.
Ralph Abraham & Sisir Roy (2012). The Atomistic Revival. World Futures 68 (1):30 - 39.
James Blackmon, David Byrd, Robert C. Cummins, Pierre Poirier & Martin Roth (2005). Atomistic Learning in Non-Modular Systems. Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):313-325.
Pierre Poirier (2005). Atomistic Learning in Non-Modular Systems. Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):313-325.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?