Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):45-46 (2001)
|Abstract||The comparative study of empathy should be based on the developmental taxonomy of vicarious experiences offered by the abundant literature on infants and children's cognitive, social, and emotional development. Comparative research on the topic should refer to the various kinds of empathy emerging in an orderly fashion early in human development.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Lois C. Wolf (1975). Children's Literature and the Development of Empathy in Young Children. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):45-49.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 310.
Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal (2001). Empathy: Each is in the Right – Hopefully, Not All in the Wrong. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):49-58.
Nancy Eisenberg (2001). Distinctions Among Various Modes of Empathy-Related Reactions: A Matter of Importance in Humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):33-34.
John N. Constantino (2001). Deconstructing Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):31-32.
Hank Davis (2001). Too Early for a Neuropsychology of Empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):32-33.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?