Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):265 - 283 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper examines employees’ reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs at the attitudinal level. The results presented are drawn from an in-depth study of two Chilean construction firms that have well-established CSR programs. Grounded theory was applied to the data prior to the construction of the conceptual framework. The analysis shows that the implementation of CSR programs generates two types of attitudes in employees: attitudes toward the organization and attitudes toward society. These two broad types of attitudes can then be broken down into four different categories: (1) acceptance of the new role of the organization, (2) identification with the organization, (3) importance attached to the work performed and (4) a sense of social justice. In turn, each of these categories is a grouping of many different concepts, some of which have at first sight little to do with CSR. Finally, the analysis reveals an attitudinal employee typology: the committed worker, the indifferent worker, and the dissident worker.|
|Keywords||CSR employee attitudes employee typology grounded theory qualitative research social justice stakeholders|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Debra Z. Basil, Mary S. Runte, M. Easwaramoorthy & Cathy Barr (2009). Company Support for Employee Volunteering: A National Survey of Companies in Canada. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):387 - 398.
Hae-Ryong Kim, Moonkyu Lee, Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee—Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):557 - 569.
Duygu Turker (2009). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):189 - 204.
Julie Pirsch, Shruti Gupta & Stacy Landreth Grau (2007). A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 70 (2):125 - 140.
Christine M. Riordan, Robert D. Gatewood & JodiBarnes Bill (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):401-412.
Jennifer Kuzma & Aliya Kuzhabekova (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Oversight. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):407-419.
Robert W. Kolodinsky, Timothy M. Madden, Daniel S. Zisk & Eric T. Henkel (2010). Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2):167 - 181.
W. Kolodinsky Robert, M. Madden Timothy, S. Zisk Daniel & T. Henkel Eric (2010). Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2).
Alan Pomering & Sara Dolnicar (2009). Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (Supp. 2):285 - 301.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,590 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?