David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72 (1):169-88 (2013)
Phenomenology is based on a doctrine of evidence that accords a crucial role to the human capacity to conceptualise or ‘intuit’ features of their experience. However, there are grounds for holding that some experiential entities to which phenomenologists are committed must be intuition-transcendent or ‘dark’. Examples of dark phenomenology include the very fine-grained perceptual discriminations which Thomas Metzinger calls ‘Raffman Qualia’ and, crucially, the structure of temporal awareness. It can be argued, on this basis, that phenomenology is in much the same epistemological relationship to its own subject matter as descriptive (i.e. ‘phenomenological’) physics or biology are to physical and biological reality: phenomenology cannot tell us what phenomenology is really ‘about’. This does not mean we should abjure phenomenology. It implies, rather, that the domain of phenomenology is not the province of a self-standing, autonomous discipline but must be investigated with any empirically fruitful techniques that are open to us (e.g. computational neuroscience, artificial intelligence, etc.). Finally, it entails that while a naturalized phenomenology should be retained as a descriptive, empirical method, it should not be accorded transcendental authority.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Donald Davidson (1984). Inquiries Into Truth And Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nagel (1974). What is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Alva Noë (2005). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Ned Block (2007). Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology and Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5):481--548.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alva Noë (2007). The Critique of Pure Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):231-245.
Tom Rockmore (2011). Kant and Phenomenology. University of Chicago Press.
Michel Henry (2008). Material Phenomenology. Fordham University Press.
Mark W. Brown (2008). The Place of Description in Phenomenology's Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):563-583.
Govinda Chandra Dev & Saiyed Abdul Hai (eds.) (1969). Phenomenology. [Dacca, Pakistan Philosophical Congress].
Joel Smith, Phenomenology. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dan Zahavi (2004). Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
Irena Martínková & Jim Parry (2011). An Introduction to the Phenomenological Study of Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):185 - 201.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Peter Carruthers & Bénédicte Veillet (2011). The Case Against Cognitive Phenomenology. In Tim Bayne & Michelle Montague (eds.), Cognitive phenomenology. Oxford University Press 35.
David Wood (2001). What is Ecophenomenology? Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):78-95.
Bence Nanay (2012). Perceptual Phenomenology. Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):235-246.
Joshua W. Clegg (2006). Phenomenology as Foundational to the Naturalized Consciousness. Culture and Psychology 12 (3):340-351.
Florian Forestier (2012). The Phenomenon and the Transcendental: Jean-Luc Marion, Marc Richir, and the Issue of Phenomenalization. Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):381-402.
Added to index2012-01-09
Total downloads120 ( #22,741 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #39,230 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?