Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design [Book Review]
Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):103-115 (2012)
|Abstract||Engineers are normally seen as the archetype of people who make decisions in a rational and quantitative way. However, technological design is not value neutral. The way a technology is designed determines its possibilities, which can, for better or for worse, have consequences for human wellbeing. This leads various scholars to the claim that engineers should explicitly take into account ethical considerations. They are at the cradle of new technological developments and can thereby influence the possible risks and benefits more directly than anybody else. I have argued elsewhere that emotions are an indispensable source of ethical insight into ethical aspects of risk. In this paper I will argue that this means that engineers should also include emotional reflection into their work. This requires a new understanding of the competencies of engineers: they should not be unemotional calculators; quite the opposite, they should work to cultivate their moral emotions and sensitivity, in order to be engaged in morally responsible engineering|
|Keywords||Engineering Design Responsibility Risk Emotion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Katz (2011). The Nazi Engineers: Reflections on Technological Ethics in Hell. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):571-582.
Michael Davis (2012). “Ain't No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):13-34.
Armin Grunwald (2001). The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
Ian StJohn Fisher (1996). What Place Does Religion Have in the Ethical Thinking of Scientists and Engineers? Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3).
Michael C. Loui (1998). The Engineer's Responsibility for Quality. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):347-350.
P. Aarne Vesilind (2002). Vestal Virgins and Engineering Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):92-101.
P. Aarne Vesilind (1998). Engineering, Ethics, and the Environment. Cambridge University Press.
Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus (ed.) (1997). Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk--Lessons Learned From the Space Shuttle. Cambridge University Press.
John Monk (2009). Ethics, Engineers and Drama. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):111-123.
Josep M. Basart & Montse Serra (2013). Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers' Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):179-187.
Michiel Brumsen & Ibo van de Poel (2001). A Special Section on Research in Engineering Ethics Towards a Research Programme for Ethics and Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):365-378.
Robert E. McGinn (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Eugene Schlossberger (1997). The Responsibility of Engineers, Appropriate Technology, and Lesser Developed Nations. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):317-326.
D. Holemans & H. Lodewyckx (1996). A Case Study of Conflicting Interests: Flemish Engineers Involved in Environmental Impact Assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):17-24.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads38 ( #35,769 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?