Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 40 (4):415-435 (2004)
|Abstract||In analysing Augustine's views on freedom it is standard to draw two distinctions; one between an earlier emphasis on human freedom and a later insistence that God alone governs human destiny, and another between pre-lapsarian and post-lapsarian freedom. These distinctions are real and important, but underlying them is a more fundamental consistency. Augustine is a compatibilist from his earliest work on freedom through his final anti-Pelagian writings, and the freedom possessed by the un-fallen and the fallen will is a compatibilist freedom. This leaves Augustine open to the charge that he makes God the ultimate cause of sin.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Burnell (1995). Concupiscence and Moral Freedom in Augustine and Before Augustine. Augustinian Studies 26 (1):49-63.
David Ray Griffin (1986). Faith and Spiritual Discipline. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):54-67.
Coleen P. Zoller (2004). Determined but Free. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):25-44.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2003). Why Christians Should Not Be Libertarians: An Augustinian Challenge. Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):460-478.
Alexandra Pârvan (2011). La Relation En Tant Qu'élément-Clé de l'Illumination Augustinienne. Chôra 7:87-103.
James Wetzel (1992). Augustine and the Limits of Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Vance G. Morgan (1994). Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #30,782 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?