Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27 (2007)
|Abstract||Anselm holds that God is timeless, time is tenseless, and humans have libertarian freedom. This combination of commitments is largely undefended incontemporary philosophy of religion. Here I explain Anselmian eternalism with its entailment of tenseless time, offer reasons for accepting it, and defend it against criticisms from William Hasker and other Open Theists. I argue that the tenseless view is coherent, that God’s eternal omniscience is consistent with libertarian freedom, that being eternal greatly enhances divine sovereignty, and that the Anselmian view supports the contention that the Bible is relevant today far better than does Open Theism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Tidman (1993). The Epistemology of Evil Possibilities. Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):181-197.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Delmas Lewis (1988). Eternity, Time and Timelessness. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):72-86.
Stephen Maitzen (2005). Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):225–239.
Klaas J. Kraay (2011). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and God's Choice of a World. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91-102.
Brian Leftow (2009). Anselmian Presentism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):297-319.
Wes Morriston (2001). Omnipotence and the Anselmian God. Philo 4 (1):7-20.
Yujin Nagasawa (2008). A New Defence of Anselmian Theism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Michael Rota (2010). A Problem for Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). Anselmian Eternalism. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #100,810 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?