David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 41 (3):249-268 (2005)
Because Anselm of Canterbury argues that the morally responsible created agent must have the option to choose between justice and benefit, many scholars conclude that he is a proto-Kantian, pitting duty against self-interest and natural inclination. This is mistaken. Anselm proposes a hierarchical schema, prefiguring that of Harry Frankfurt, in which the inclination for justice constitutes a second-order desire that one's first-order desires for benefits should be moderated to conform to God's will. I defend this interpretation through careful textual analysis, then show that Anselm's hierarchical analysis is not subject to some of the criticisms one might raise against Frankfurt's.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ben Novak (2008). Anselm on Nothing. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):305-320.
Katherin A. Rogers (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Katherin Rogers (2009). Back to Eternalism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
Thomas Williams (2009). Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Gregory B. Sadler (2007). Freedom, Inclinations of the Will, and Virtue in Anselm's Moral Th Eory. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:91-108.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). Libertarianism in Kane and Anselm. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:279-290.
Stan R. Tyvoll (2006). Anselm's Definition of Free Will. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #189,581 of 1,724,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,164 of 1,724,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?