David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310 (2007)
Following Anselm of Canterbury I argue against Hugh McCann’s claim that a traditional, classical theist understanding of God’s relationship to creation entails that God is the cause of our choices, including our choice to sin. I explain Anselm’s thesis that God causes all that has ontological status, yet does not cause sin. Then I show that McCann’s God, if not a sinner, must nonetheless be an unloving deceiver, McCann’s theodicy fails on its own terms, his proposed requirements for moral authenticity are insufficient, and his suggestion that his universe is “safer” than Anselm’s is misguided
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Hugh J. McCann (2009). God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm. Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.
Katherin A. Rogers (2011). Anselm Against McCann On God and Sin. Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):397-415.
William L. Rowe (1999). Problem of Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):98-101.
Rik Peels (2011). Sin and Human Cognition of God. Scottish Journal of Theology 64 (4):390-409.
Katherin A. Rogers (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
Marilyn Adams (2011). Julian of Norwich: Problems of Evil and the Seriousness of Sin. Philosophia 39 (3):433-447.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). The Necessity of the Present and Anselm's Eternalist Response to the Problem of Theological Fatalism. Religious Studies 43 (1):25-47.
Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams (2009). Anselm. Oxford University Press.
Katherin Rogers (2005). God and Moral Realism. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):103-118.
Steven S. Aspenson (1996). Anselmian Satisfaction, Duns Scotus and The Debt of Sin. Modern Schoolman 73 (2):141 - 158.
Thomas Williams, Saint Anselm. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #152,266 of 1,099,963 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,994 of 1,099,963 )
How can I increase my downloads?