David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):553-557 (2000)
The public communication of science and technology has become increasingly important over the last several decades. However, understanding the audience that receives this information remains the weak link in the science communication process. This essay provides a brief review of some of the issues involved, discusses results from an audience-based study, and suggests some strategies that both scientists and journalists can use to modify media coverage in ways that can help audiences better understand major public issues that involve science and technology.
|Keywords||audiences public interest of science public understanding of science science journalism science communication science news mass media|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lisa N. Geller (2000). Commentary on “Seeds of Discontent: Expert Opinion, Mass Media Message, and the Public Image of Agricultural Biotechnology” (Priest and Gillespie). Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):541-542.
Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird (2000). Ethical Issues in Communicating Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
Professor Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird (2000). Ethical Issues in Communicating Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
Similar books and articles
Paul Faulkner (2007). On Telling and Trusting. Mind 116 (464):875-902.
Maja Horst (2011). Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
James O. Young (2010). Art and the Educated Audience. Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.
Friedrich Christoph Doerge & Mark Siebel (2008). Gricean Communication and Transmission of Thoughts. Erkenntnis 69 (1):55 - 67.
Sybil Francis (1999). Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Marko Ahteensuu (2012). Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):295-313.
Hugh M. Culbertson (1989). Should Journalists Follow or Lead Their Audiences?: A Study of Student Beliefs. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):193 – 213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #208,963 of 1,792,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,937 of 1,792,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?