The necessity of the present and Anselm's eternalist response to the problem of theological fatalism
Religious Studies 43 (1):25-47 (2007)
|Abstract||It is often argued that the eternalist solution to the freedom/foreknowledge dilemma fails. If God's knowledge of your choices is eternally fixed, your choices are necessary and cannot be free. Anselm of Canterbury proposes an eternalist view which entails that all of time is equally real and truly present to God. God's knowledge of your choices entails only a ‘consequent’ necessity which does not conflict with libertarian freedom. I argue this by showing that if consequent necessity does conflict with libertarian freedom then God's knowledge in the present would conflict with the freedom of a present choice. Absurd. (Published Online January 15 2007).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jasper Hopkins (1983). Anselm on Freedom and the Will. Philosophy Research Archives 9:471-493.
Katherin Rogers (2007). Anselm and His Islamic Contempories on Divine Necessity and Eternity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):373-393.
Michael Rota (2010). A Problem for Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
John J. Fitzgerald (2008). Timeless Troubles. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:203-215.
Ted A. Warfield & Alicia Finch (1999). Fatalism: Logical and Theological. Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):233-238.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Katherin A. Rogers (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #25,083 of 556,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,122 of 556,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?