David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 32 (2):165 - 186 (1996)
Traditionally God has been considered absolutely simple. Some contemporary philosophers argue that this means that God is His attributes and hence is mere quality, and that all the divine attributes name exactly the same quality, which is incoherent. However, the contemporary debate misunderstands the tradition. God is not quality, He is act. Analogies from human experience can minimize the initial implausibility. There are worrisome corollaries to this doctrine, the most troubling being that God's nature is somehow dependent on the choices of His free creatures. This conclusion, though radical, is not as shocking as it appears.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anders Kraal (2011). Logic and Divine Simplicity. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):282-294.
Christopher A. Franks (2005). The Simplicity of the Living God: Aquinas, Barth, and Some Philosophers. Modern Theology 21 (2):275-300.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey E. Brower (2008). Making Sense of Divine Simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.
Graham Oppy (2003). The Devilish Complexities of Divine Simplicity. Philo 6 (1):10-22.
Jeffrey E. Brower (2009). Simplicity and Aseity. In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press 105-28.
W. Matthews Grant (2003). Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Ismail Cetin (2009). Some Reflections on the Concept of 'Timeless God' in Western Thought. Kaygi 12:225 - 234.
Arjan Markus (2004). Divine Timelessness: A Coherent but Unfruitful Doctrine? Sophia 43 (2):29-48.
Susan Peppers-Bates (2008). Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
R. T. Mullins (2016). Divine Perfection and Creation. Heythrop Journal 57 (1):122-134.
Alexander Pruss (2008). On Two Problems of Divine Simplicity. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1:150-167.
Brian Leftow (1990). Is God an Abstract Object? Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
Thomas V. Morris (ed.) (1987). The Concept of God. Oxford University Press.
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Mohammad Saeedimehr (2007). Divine Simplicity. Topoi 26 (2):191-199.
Norman Kretzmann (1985). Absolute Simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 2 (4):353-382.
T. Ryan Byerly (2012). Why Persons Cannot Be Properties. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):67-83.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads21 ( #196,571 of 1,939,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #99,464 of 1,939,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?