David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kant-Studien 100 (3):346-368 (2009)
This paper develops an interpretation of the relationship between Kant's various formulations of the categorical imperative in the Groundwork that steers a middle course between the formal and substantive poles of the interpretive spectrum, represented by John Rawls and Barbara Herman, respectively. Accepting and rejecting key aspects of both Rawls's and Herman's interpretations, I argue that the first formulation, understood correctly, does suffice to determine all Kantian moral duties, but only if duties are regarded as situation-specific rather than standing obligations. I also argue, however, that the second and third formulations provide information that is necessary for understanding and applying the first formulation to determine one's duty correctly, and that the formulations are in a sense equivalent even though each plays a distinctive and important role.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Margit Ruffing (2011). Kant-Bibliographie 2009. Kant-Studien 102 (4):499-540.
Similar books and articles
Keya Maitra (2006). Comparing the Bhagavad-Gita and Kant. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):63-67.
Steven Sverdlik (2001). Kant, Nonaccidentalness and the Availability of Moral Worth. Journal of Ethics 5 (4):293-313.
Barbara Herman (1981). On the Value of Acting From the Motive of Duty. Philosophical Review 90 (3):359-382.
Helga Varden (2010). G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality - A Critical Engagement. Social Philosophy Today 26:175-189.
Joshua M. Glasgow (2003). Expanding the Limits of Universalization: Kant's Duties and Kantian Moral Deliberation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):23 - 47.
Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, Christine M. Korsgaard & John Rawls (eds.) (1997). Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge University Press.
Noa Latham (1994). Causally Irrelevant Reasons and Action Solely From the Motive of Duty. Journal of Philosophy 91 (11):599-618.
Koray Tütüncü (2007). The Role of "Legality" in Kant's Moral Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:29-34.
Melissa Seymour Fahmy (2010). Kantian Practical Love. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). 'How "Full" is Kant's Categorical Imperative?'. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 3:465-509.
Added to index2009-09-17
Total downloads49 ( #33,090 of 1,101,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,950 of 1,101,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?