Austrian theories of judgment: Bolzano, Brentano, meinong, and Husserl
In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Wolfgang Huemer (eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy. Ontos (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJocelyn Benoist (forthcoming). De Kant à Bolzano : Husserl Et L'Analyticité. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale.
Linda L. McAlister (ed.) (1977). The Philosophy of Brentano. Humanities Press.
Dallas Willard (2002). Robin D. Rollinger, Husserl's Position in the School of Brentano. Husserl Studies 18 (1):77-81.
Wayne M. Martin (2006). Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Textor (2009). Review of Robin D. Rollinger, Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Object. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (6).
Carlo Ierna (2008). Husserl's Critique of Double Judgments. In Filip Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives. Springer.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). Particularised Attributes. In M. Textor (ed.), The Austrian Contribution to Analytic Philosophy. Routledge.
Carlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
