by Holmes Rolston III
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Both science and ethics are embedded in cultural traditions where truths are shared through education; both need competent critics educated within such traditions. Education in both ought to be directed although moral education demands levels of responsible agency that science education does not. Evolutionary science often carries an implicit or explicit understanding of who and what humans are, one which may not be coherent with the implicit or explicit human self-understanding in moral education
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Holmes Rolston (1988). Science Education and Moral Education. Zygon 23 (3):347-355.
Katie McShane (2007). Rolston's Theory of Value. In Christopher J. Preston and Wayne Ouderkirk (ed.), Nature, Value, Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III. Springer
Holmes Rolston, Iii (1999). Genes, Genesis, and God: Values and Their Origins in Natural and Human History. Cambridge University Press.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1999). Environment and the Moral Life. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):441-443.
John Mizzoni (2002). Against Rolston's Defense of Eating Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):125-131.
Christopher J. Preston (1998). Epistemology and Intrinsic Values: Norton and Callicott's Critiques of Rolston. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):409-428.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1999). Environment and the Moral Life: Towards a New Paradigm. Environmental Ethics 21 (4):441-443.
Iii Rolston Holmes (1995). Does Aesthetic Appreciation of Landscapes Need to Be Science-Based? British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (4).
Iii Holmes Rolston (1975). Schlick's Responsible Man. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (2):261-267.
Wayne Ouderkirk (1999). Can Nature Be Evil?: Rolston, Disvalue, and Theodicy. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Francisco Benzoni (1996). Rolston's Theological Ethic. Environmental Ethics 18 (4):339-352.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1987). Before It is Too Late. Environmental Ethics 9 (3):269-271.
Holmes Rolston Iii (1975). Is There an Ecological Ethic? Ethics 85 (2):93-.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1985). The Fallacy of Wildlife Conservation. Environmental Ethics 7 (2):177-180.
Iii Holmes Rolston (2008). Ecology Redesigning Genes. Environmental Ethics 30 (2):215-216.
Added to index2012-05-04
Total downloads35 ( #115,451 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #49,379 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?