David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):470-494 (2011)
I introduce a case study from organization studies to argue that social epistemologists’ recommendation to cultivate diversity and dissent in science is unlikely to be welcomed in the social sciences unless it is coupled with another epistemic ideal: the norm of epistemic responsibility. The norm of epistemic responsibility enables me to show that organization scholars’ concern with the fragmentation of their discipline is generated by false assumptions: the assumption that a diversity of theoretical approaches will lead to fragmentation and the assumption that an imposed consensus on a theoretical approach is needed to maintain the unity of the discipline
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kristina Rolin (2015). Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration. Philosophy of Science 82 (2):157-177.
Kristina Rolin (2016). Values, Standpoints, and Scientific/Intellectual Movements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:11-19.
Similar books and articles
Miriam Solomon (2006). Norms of Epistemic Diversity. Episteme 3 (1-2):23-36.
Miriam Solomon (2001). Consensus in Science. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:193-204.
Robert C. H. Chia (ed.) (1998). Organized Worlds: Explorations in Technology and Organization with Robert Cooper. Routledge.
Erika Summers-Effler (2007). Vortexes of Involvement: Social Systems as Turbulent Flow. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):433-448.
Debora Hammond (1995). Cultural Diversity and the Systems View. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (1):13-18.
Julie I. Siciliano (1996). The Relationship of Board Member Diversity to Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (12):1313 - 1320.
S. Fuller (2010). The Dissent Over Dissent Over Descent. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):479-503.
James Bohman (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
Jerzy Kolasa & Eugeniusz Biesiadka (1984). Diversity Concept in Ecology. Acta Biotheoretica 33 (3):145-162.
Jerome Gellman (1993). Religious Diversity and the Epistemic Justification of Religious Belief. Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):345-364.
I. Kalin (2011). Religion, Unity and Diversity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):471-478.
Elizabeth Anderson (2006). The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.
Johannes Gadner, Renate Buber & Lyn Richards (eds.) (2003). Organising Knowledge: Methods and Case Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Steve Smith (2011). Equality and Diversity: Value Incommensurability and the Politics of Recognition. Policy Press.
Uskali Mäki (2001). Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):488-506.
Added to index2010-09-09
Total downloads11 ( #382,511 of 1,932,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,270 of 1,932,544 )
How can I increase my downloads?