Hypatia 17 (4):95-118 (2002)
|Abstract||: It is now recognized that relations of trust play an epistemic role in science. The contested issue is under what conditions trust in scientific testimony is warranted. I argue that John Hardwig's view of trustworthy scientific testimony is inadequate because it does not take into account the possibility that credibility does not reliably reflect trustworthiness, and because it does not appreciate the role communities have in guaranteeing the trustworthiness of scientific testimony|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Audi (forthcoming). Testimony as a Social Foundation of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
N. F. Bews & G. J. Rossouw (2002). A Role for Business Ethics in Facilitating Trustworthiness. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):377 - 390.
Paul L. Harris & Melissa A. Koenig (2007). The Basis of Epistemic Trust: Reliable Testimony or Reliable Sources? Episteme 4 (3):264-284.
Tomoji Shogenji (2006). A Defense of Reductionism About Testimonial Justification of Beliefs. Noûs 40 (2):331–346.
Gerald Marsh (2011). Trust, Testimony, and Prejudice in the Credibility Economy. Hypatia 26 (2):280-293.
Paul Faulkner (2011). Knowledge on Trust. OUP Oxford.
Robert C. Solomon (1998). Creating Trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Kyle Powys Whyte & Robert Crease (2010). Trust, Expertise and the Philosophy of Science. Synthese 177 (3):411-425.
John Hardwig (1991). The Role of Trust in Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 88 (12):693-708.
Stephen Wright (2010). Trust and Trustworthiness. Philosophia 38 (3):615-627.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,856 of 549,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?