David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233 - 250 (2008)
From an analysis of the role of companies in multi-stakeholder networks and a critical review of stakeholder theory, it is argued that companies practise two different types of stakeholder management: they focus on their organization’s welfare (organization- focussed stakeholder management) or on an issue that affects their relationship with other societal groups and organizations (issue-focussed stakeholder management). These two approaches supplement each other. It is demonstrated that issue-focussed stakeholder management dominates in multi-stakeholder networks, because it enables corporations to address complex problems and challenges in cooperation with stakeholders. Since deliberation is the key to issue-focussed stakeholder management, it helps to cope with numerous and at times contradictory stakeholder demands and enhances the legitimacy of corporate activities.
|Keywords||stakeholder management stakeholder dialogue multi-stakeholder network deliberation conflict management corporate citizenship issue management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):77-87.
Eleanor R. E. O’Higgins (2010). Corporations, Civil Society, and Stakeholders: An Organizational Conceptualization. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):157 - 176.
Elisabet Garriga Cots (2011). Stakeholder Social Capital: A New Approach to Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics 20 (4):328-341.
Terry Beckman, Alison Colwell & Peggy H. Cunningham (2009). The Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility in Chile: The Importance of Authenticity and Social Networks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):191 - 206.
Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen & Hanna Lehtimäki (2012). Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):53-65.
Similar books and articles
Steven J. Maranville (1989). You Can't Make Steel Without Having Some Smoke: A Case Study in Stakeholder Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (1):57 - 63.
Kelly C. Strong, Richard C. Ringer & Steven A. Taylor (2001). THE* Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (* Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy). Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):219 - 230.
Stephen L. Payne & Jerry M. Calton (2004). Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (1):71 - 78.
Mark Starik (1995). Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):207 - 217.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1991). Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):53-73.
Duane Windsor (2010). The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):79-87.
Jane Wei-Skillern (2004). The Evolution of Shell's Stakeholder Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (4):713-728.
Bryan W. Husted (1998). Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):643 - 651.
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Julia Roloff (2008). A Life Cycle Model of Multi-Stakeholder Networks. Business Ethics 17 (3):311–325.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #25,059 of 1,100,145 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #18,960 of 1,100,145 )
How can I increase my downloads?