Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 141 (3):333-364 (2004)
|Abstract||ABSTRACT. This paper studies the use of hypotheses schemes in generating inductive predictions. After discussing Carnap–Hintikka inductive logic, hypotheses schemes are defined and illustrated with two partitions. One partition results in the Carnapian continuum of inductive methods, the other results in predictions typical for hasty generalization. Following these examples I argue that choosing a partition comes down to making inductive assumptions on patterns in the data, and that by choosing appropriately any inductive assumption can be made. Further considerations on partitions make clear that they do not suggest any solution to the problem of induction. Hypotheses schemes provide the tools for making inductive assumptions, but they also reveal the need for such assumptions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick Maher (2006). A Conception of Inductive Logic. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):513-523.
Brian Skyrms (1991). Carnapian Inductive Logic for Markov Chains. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):439 - 460.
Festa, Roberto, Optimum Inductive Methods. A Study in Inductive Probability, Bayesian Statistics, and Verisimilitude.
John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
John Norton (2010). Deductively Definable Logies of Induction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):617 - 654.
Jan-Willem Romeijn (2004). Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions. Synthese 141 (3):333 - 364.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?