David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Phaenomenologica 8:15-46 (2008)
This paper tries to explore the legitimacy of applying the phenomenological approach to poems, novels, to all that we classify, too conveniently, under the term “literature.” Such an approach is grounded in one claim: the literary text opens up to a world that is its “thing itself”. The thing of the text is not the text as a thing, in its linguistic and formal properties, no more than the thing of the painting is the canvas coated with pigments. However, what is the status of such a “world”? Is this “opening of a world” only a metaphor? Is the world of the literary work only an imaginary one? In order to answer these questions, it is necessary, first of all, to understand the limits of the structuralist claim that the object of literature is only literature as an object, that is as a linguistic construction and, secondly, to be aware of what is specific to the phenomenological account of the imaginary, in contrast with alternative accounts, such as the one grounded in the theory of speech acts and developed, among others, by Searle
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Denisa Butnaru (2008). The Literary Text and the System of Relevances. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:83-108.
Mark Sentesy & Jean-Luc Nancy (2011). Fantastic Phenomena. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):228-237.
Anders Pettersson (2012). The Concept of Literary Application: Readers' Analogies From Text to Life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stein Haugom Olsen & Anders Pettersson (eds.) (2005). From Text to Literature: New Analytic and Pragmatic Approaches. Palgrave Macmillan.
L. A. Paul (2006). In Defense of Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):333–372.
Anders M. Gullestad (2011). Literature and the Parasite. Deleuze Studies 5 (3):301-323.
Kenneth Burke (1967). The Philosophy of Literary Form. Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press.
A. G. Gross (2013). Some Limits of Non-Dualism. Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):242-246.
Panos Theodorou (2004). Of the Same in the Different. What is Wrong with Kuhn's Use of ``Seeing'' and ``Seeing As''. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (1):175-200.
Jean Greisch (2004). Ontology, Onto-Mythology, and the Imaginary-Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):239-254.
Kenneth Burke (1973). The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. University of California Press.
Alan Paskow (2004). The Paradoxes of Art: A Phenomenological Investigation. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Silcox & Jon Cogburn (2006). Computability Theory and Literary Competence. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):369-386.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads219 ( #12,349 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)54 ( #9,857 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?